Why aren’t you at the library?

  At the beginning of this term, there was considerable outcry over the cuts to the library budget, which had eliminated evening and Sunday hours. After the ups and downs of the first few weeks, money was finally appropriated from somewhere else to hire another research librarian. An incredibly quick hiring process ensued, and we now have another part-time, degree holding employee. The library extended its hours into the evening and again opened on Sundays, traditionally a busy day at the Antioch College library.

Given the amount of concern vocalized by students over the lack of evening and weekend hours, people writing their senior projects this fall and the infamous Research Methods being taught, one would assume the library is brimming at night.

And yet, at seven o’clock on Tuesday, there are a grand total of six people in the library. Two of them are librarians, and one of them is me, the work-study library clerk. Every one of the three people who aren’t being paid to be here is working on a computer. By eight o’clock, two people have come in for a Research Methods reserve reading, and two more people have come to use a computer.

This particularly scene is not uncommon. Every evening but Sunday is a virtual graveyard, and most of the people who do come in are here to use a computer. There’s nothing wrong with coming to the library to use a computer, but that function could be provided by a computer lab. We don’t need thousands of books, hundreds of bound periodicals, microfilm, three reference librarians and OhioLink if the only thing students need to do is check their email. There is a core group of people that are here practically every day, but it’s no more than ten people.

It’s possible that this is simply a reflection of the ascendancy of the Internet as a research tool. Certainly many fine sources of information are available online, and some are even available for free. Many libraries have gone so far as to start digitizing their collections, although these generally are only available to members of that particular library system.

Considering, though, that Antioch does not subscribe to JSTOR, Lexis-Nexis, or similar services, anyone doing all of their research online, from their dorm room, doesn’t have access to very good sources. No matter what you’re studying, if you’re doing exclusively online research, you’re doing bad research. The Internet has its own systemic biases, just like any other information system, and the easiest way to compensate for those biases is to get into a library.

Perhaps you’re thinking that the Olive Kettering Library doesn’t have that much to offer. Some elementary school libraries have more square footage, and most college libraries are in nicer buildings, with newer computers. You may also wonder why the library needs to open late, when all you do is check reserve readings out and then bring them back. Or maybe you, like many of our patrons, think the library is just plain creepy. Especially the basement.

Contrary to popular belief, the library does have quite a bit to offer. It’s true that it doesn’t always have the popular stuff, but where the Olive lacks in quantity it makes up for in quality. The library has amazing periodicals, covering an enormous and sometimes ridiculous set of topics and including some rare gems you quite literally won’t find anywhere else. We have dozens of journals on physics alone, and I have photocopied more thirty-year old articles from mechanical engineering volumes than I could ever want to. Practically every magazine we have ever subscribed to was collected, bound and put in the basement for future scholars.

In the bound periodicals section, you can find the entire press run of Z Magazine, the lefty political and cultural journal. Okay, maybe that’s not so impressive, considering much of their archive is online for free. But we also have every issue of Sewanee Review, a prominent literary magazine, from their first printing in 1892 to the latest issue. The library has also subscribed to magazines that turned out to be less long lived than Sewanee, like Plain Talk, an anti-Communist political journal that only published from 1946 to 1950. Or you could thumb through the official League of Nations journal if you’re interested in how the precursor to the United Nations did business, and perhaps how they turned into the United Nations.

The Internet can’t provide the information gathering skills of a trained reference librarian. At the beginning of the term, and during the budget cuts of last term, there was a lot of talk about student volunteers to run the library. Obviously student employees are awesome, but we aren’t librarians and we just don’t have the same skills reference librarians have. Google doesn’t have these kinds of skills either.

Three of our five non-student employees have a Master’s in either library science or information science, which is the terminal degree in that field. Basically, they are incredibly skilled at what they do and certainly more skilled than us students, library clerks or no. We are here to check your books in and out and answer the phone. They are here to track down obscure publication statistics for a book or teach you the many layers of nuance in a search term.

An empty library reflects poorly on this school, no matter what time of day it is. I have seen touring families come into the library, walk around, marvel at the emptiness, and then come to the circulation desk and ask where everyone is. This should not be, not at a college that claims strong academics in spite of a small student body and even smaller budget. Not at a college that requires undergraduates to do original research, a task usually left until graduate school.

So what are you doing reading this? Why aren’t you at the library? If you’re scared of the basement, I’ll show you where all the light switches are.

Library shows heavy decay

Olive Kettering Library WallsOnly in February, at a memorial in honor of head librarian Joe Cali, Antioch’s Olive Kettering library was praised by Ohio librarians and college professors for its continued excellence in light of limited resources. Now yellow caution tape wreathes the 53-year-old building, marking a large bulge that stretches across the back of the college’s pride of ages. The Olive Kettering Library is slowly falling apart, but relief is nowhere in sight.

Constructed in 1954 the OK opened its doors with the agreement that it should be rebuilt in 1974. Due to a lack of resources, however, the engagement was never fulfilled and 53 the Olive is still standing unchanged. The outside wall is falling apart because of a rain damage and corrosion over the years.

Continue reading Library shows heavy decay

Rising Concern about Struggling Library

The announcement of the Board of Trustees meeting in June to suspend the operations of the college sparked another series of serious staff cuts. It has left the remaining members of the college staff and faculty scrambling to cover workloads far greater than in years past. In February, the struggling college already had to eliminate twenty non-faculty positions.

As Jill Becker, Associate Professor of Dance, mentioned at the open meeting of the Board of Trustees on Saturday, services such as housekeeping and security have been cut, as well as the hours of the Olive Kettering Library on campus. While the library was formerly open Monday through Friday, 8:30am to 11:00pm, staff cuts have reduced the available hours considerably. Students and faculty now have to do without the library in the evenings and Sundays.

Continue reading Rising Concern about Struggling Library

Letter from Jean Gregorek in response to Ralph Keyes

Jean Gregorek, Associate Professor of Literature, responds to Ralph Keyes’s “Present at the Demise” published in the Chronicle of Higher Education

Web Editors Note – Accessing Ralph’s letter at the Chronicle of Higher Education website requires a login but Ralph also recently posted this article here : ilfpost.org/?p=230 and this is the link provided above.

The comment thread on this article at the Chronicle is here: chronicle.com/forums/index.php/topic,39968.0.html

I would like to respond to Ralph Keyes’s essay “Present at the Demise,” which offers his observations on what has led the Antioch University Board of Trustees to announce the closing of Antioch College. I have been teaching literature full time at Antioch College since 1994. While Mr Keyes makes some comments that strike me as valid, on the whole my experience here has been quite different. Continue reading Letter from Jean Gregorek in response to Ralph Keyes

Letter from Callie Cary

“In our society the two institutions commissioned to provide the substance of a democratic public sphere, as a place for critical nquiry, are the news media and academia.?
This quote comes from a review of David Horowitz’s book “The Professors: The 101 Most Dangerous Academics in America? by 1979 alumnus Robert McCheseney entitled “David Horowitz and the Attack on Independent Thought,? “ in which both McCheseney and Antioch alum Gordon Fellman ‘57 are included.

Robert McCheseney is a Research Professor in the Institute of Communications Research and the Graduate School of Library and Information Science at the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign.

Changing campus culture in the name of intellectual freedom is certainly not a new theme in the higher education community. The larger question is how is the term intellectual freedom being defined and by whom? Are the standards universally applied to everyone in the community, and who or what are the arbiters of those standards? And finally, what are the intended educational outcomes of these cultural changes?

It was made clear by President Lawry in his first address at Community Meeting last spring, as well as at subsequent meetings with the Alumni Board and alumni groups around the country, that he seemed to arrive with an agenda, a preconceived opinion about the campus culture and the governance system.

According to the President’s assessment, as stated in “Lawry Challenges Campus Culture; Students Troubled? (Yellow Springs News, 10/5/06), students are too confrontational, lack mutual respect and social maturity, are self-indulgent, use menacing language, and speak irresponsibly, and all these behaviors lead to an anti-intellectual, closed community that prevents students from being able to “embrace the full spectrum of ideas and opinions, without prejudgment….? The article goes on to say that Lawry feels that “A less threatening campus…will help the College retain some of the students who tend to leave Antioch because they feel attacked by other students.?

Where did the President’s perspective come from after such limited exposure to the student body, or anyone else in the community? Is this based on anecdotal information provided by those who oriented him before his arrival? In his presentations, Lawry sites a conversation he had with a student while he was on campus being interviewed for the presidency- a student who had said that he might transfer out of Antioch because he felt uncomfortable with the campus culture. Lawry has also mentioned how a student wearing Nike sneakers got attacked for not being more sensitive to the scourge of sweatshop production. OK, but is there some concrete data to support the theory that the campus culture is the main reason we lose students, or why students don’t come to Antioch? Past data from the exit interviews conducted by the Dean of Students Office over the years has shown that students leave for a variety reasons, including financial, social, academic, developmental, and finding a dream co-op, but very rarely because of campus culture and climate. According to existing data, there has never been one overriding reason for student attrition.

And so, it’s been almost 10 months since this message was first delivered. What steps have been taken to change the campus culture? Apparently, the governance system has been targeted as an axis of confrontation and is described as “out of control? and combative with the administration.

I am puzzled by this assessment. I served on Community Council (ComCil) in 05/06 and was extremely impressed with the high and civil level of discourse between faculty, staff and students, the student chair’s oversight of the meetings, the humor and creativity of the members, and the overall sense of responsibility members felt for the community. We debated, persuaded, challenged, changed our minds, built consensus and agonized over some difficult and frustrating situations on the campus. We also made every effort to engage with the administration to orient the new President to the Council’s purpose, and to express concern over some of the decisions that were being made without any consultation with Comcil, decisions that had historically been brought to Comcil for deliberation and input.

Although at times a very frustrating experience, for me as an alum, it defined one of Antioch’s core values and part of its mission – to create informed risk takers through participation in a laboratory of democratic decision- making. It would be a mistake to define Antioch’s system of governance as a locus of power for all decision- making, but it would be equally misguided to discredit and ignore the significant educational implications of the decision-making process that happens within this system.

Community governance at Antioch provides one of the most unique educational experiences the College has to offer and, if properly facilitated, allows all community members to feel some ownership and responsibility for the community in which they live and work. For students, these skills are further developed and tested in the various co-op communities they enter around the globe. It is this praxis that, with trial and error, teaches students some sense of humility and cultural mobility. It is the ingredient that helps to turn out so many interesting, entrepreneurial, and, yes, outspoken graduates. Last year Antioch College had three graduating students receive Fulbright awards. That sort of intellectual inquiry doesn’t happen in a vacuum!

I have never understood the concern that oppositional perspectives, be they conservative or radical, are somehow oppressed at Antioch.

Antioch alumni, young and old, have always been represented throughout the political spectrum. I know for a fact that Republicans and radicals (some now democrats) actually sit side-by-side with each other as Trustees and Alumni Board members! The alumni work in both the for-profit and non-profit sectors, many are organizers, artists and educators, but regardless of their path, most feel passionately about their values. The alumni take Antioch’s first President Horace Mann’s dictum “Be ashamed to die until you win some victory for humanity? very seriously.

There are some very real challenges facing Antioch right now, and while there is nothing inherently wrong with working on creating a campus that promotes open dialog, the administration needs to be sure to walk the talk and to create a forum that builds consensus around what the walk is…and maybe what shoes should be worn. I would also hope that energy is quickly shifted to other institutional priorities with specific steps being outlined on how best to address the recruitment and retention of students and faculty of color, improving the physical plant, supporting faculty moral, professional development and the integrity of tenure, and building a culture of mutual respect and labor incentives for the union workers, exempt staff and middle managers.

Top-down decision-making rarely has any educational value and it generally doesn’t promote a climate of mutual respect or intellectual freedom. If retention, recruitment and fund raising are the priorities right now (as they have been for decades), the entire Antioch community should be embraced as ambassadors, future alumni, future donors, future leaders, and advocates of an extraordinary educational experience that has held a truly unique place in the landscape of higher education.

Callie Cary ‘84
Second-generation alum and former Director of Alumni Relations