What is it?
Tenure is a contractual agreement between a particular faculty member and a school, college or university. After a probationary period and a series of reviews during which the faculty member demonstrates his or her value to the institution, that faculty member is offered a permanent position, or tenure. Exceptions usually apply in cases of financial exigency on the part of the college, or illegal or unprofessional behavior on the part of the faculty member. Continue reading Tenure: Why it Matters
Tag: tenure
McGregor Faculty Speak on Tenure
At McGregor, as in all other satellites of Antioch University, faculty are under limited-year contracts that do not entitle them to the protection and rights that tenured faculty benefit from. “No tenure adds to a sense of contingency,†remarked Professor Joe Cronin, “you could be let go for any reason any year.… Next year if there isn’t enough money, my job might not be there.â€
Professor Jim Malarkey joined McGregor at its creation and has been working at Antioch for 22 years. Yet he too does not benefit from contractual employment security. He does not feel like the lack of tenure has been impairing his academic freedom, even when teaching such controversial subjects as Middle Eastern studies. “I’m more afraid of Homeland Security than of Antioch University Administration,†he commented, “they care about revenue.†Professor Susanne Fest corroborated this view, recounting “I have been very free to teach my courses…. I have never experienced any interference in terms of my teaching and my research.â€
Involvement of faculty in governance is another issue, however. “Faculty governance to date is negligible, not to say nonexistent†said Fest, whereas Cronin remarked, “Many important decisions are made from top-down, often in ways that do not include faculty.†Malarkey pointed out the ideological contradiction between the institution’s values and its practices. “Douglas McGregor was famous for his theory of participatory management. If we’re naming ourselves after McGregor, there’s a lot of changes to be made about the way we govern ourselves,†he declared. “I think that’s a serious problem; not enough attention is given to sustain that legacy.â€
“Whether I get a multi-year contract after this article on it is a real question. So watch what happens next year.â€
The uncertainty generated by the lack of tenure can go as far as limit professors’ liberty to speak out. “We are a very cautious faculty,†commented Fest, “because we don’t want to jeopardize our jobs.… So far I’ve got the multi-year contract that I’ve applied for. Whether I get a multi-year contract after this article appears with my name on it is a real question. So watch what happens next year.â€
McGregor President Barbara Danley declared that Vice Chancellor for University Academic Affairs Laurien Alexandre was looking into the possibility of a multiple year contract for faculty university-wide. She stated that it was not in her power to decide on implementing tenure at McGregor as the decision is made “across the university.â€
“If we had tenure at McGregor, we would have a very different faculty,†predicted Fest, who emphasized the difference of cultures between the college and adult campuses. She mentioned “certain obligations that come with [tenure]†like the production of scholar work. She told of her own experience as a non-first career academic. “Competing against students in their late twenties or early thirties who had gone through high powered university programs would have been impossible,†she said, and added that many McGregor faculty were in similar positions.
“The trend in history is more contingent faculty, and I don’t like this trend,†said Cronin. The subject of tenure reaches far beyond the border of the Antioch University system, and can be envisioned as a political issue. “Higher education right now is in a period of time where corporatization is pushing in every direction,†declared Malarkey, raising the “question of the extent to which the University needs to be corporatized.â€
Letter from Jean Gregorek in response to Ralph Keyes
Jean Gregorek, Associate Professor of Literature, responds to Ralph Keyes’s “Present at the Demise†published in the Chronicle of Higher Education
Web Editors Note – Accessing Ralph’s letter at the Chronicle of Higher Education website requires a login but Ralph also recently posted this article here : ilfpost.org/?p=230 and this is the link provided above.
The comment thread on this article at the Chronicle is here: chronicle.com/forums/index.php/topic,39968.0.html
I would like to respond to Ralph Keyes’s essay “Present at the Demise,†which offers his observations on what has led the Antioch University Board of Trustees to announce the closing of Antioch College. I have been teaching literature full time at Antioch College since 1994. While Mr Keyes makes some comments that strike me as valid, on the whole my experience here has been quite different. Continue reading Letter from Jean Gregorek in response to Ralph Keyes
Science & Democracy
By James White
I think that the most iconoclastic revolutionaries of all time were not Lenin, Mao, Bakunin, or Zapata, but rather Galileo, Einstein, Darwin, and Newton. Scientists have repeatedly overturned superstition and fought on the barricades against ignorance. Scientists are a testament to humanism, the belief in man, a belief that is essential for democracy.
Basis
Science is a tired pugilist clinging to the ropes, however. A fundamentalist Christian group Answers in Genesis is building a $20 million museum outside Cincinnati. The museum wants to present a myopic view of history that is contradictory to everything known about physics, geology, biology, and chemistry. The people responsible for this affront to knowledge claim to do so to combat the forces of “secularism†(read: empiric knowledge).
Continue reading Science & Democracy
Letter from Callie Cary
“In our society the two institutions commissioned to provide the substance of a democratic public sphere, as a place for critical nquiry, are the news media and academia.�
This quote comes from a review of David Horowitz’s book “The Professors: The 101 Most Dangerous Academics in America� by 1979 alumnus Robert McCheseney entitled “David Horowitz and the Attack on Independent Thought,� “ in which both McCheseney and Antioch alum Gordon Fellman ‘57 are included.
Robert McCheseney is a Research Professor in the Institute of Communications Research and the Graduate School of Library and Information Science at the University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign.
Changing campus culture in the name of intellectual freedom is certainly not a new theme in the higher education community. The larger question is how is the term intellectual freedom being defined and by whom? Are the standards universally applied to everyone in the community, and who or what are the arbiters of those standards? And finally, what are the intended educational outcomes of these cultural changes?
It was made clear by President Lawry in his first address at Community Meeting last spring, as well as at subsequent meetings with the Alumni Board and alumni groups around the country, that he seemed to arrive with an agenda, a preconceived opinion about the campus culture and the governance system.
According to the President’s assessment, as stated in “Lawry Challenges Campus Culture; Students Troubled� (Yellow Springs News, 10/5/06), students are too confrontational, lack mutual respect and social maturity, are self-indulgent, use menacing language, and speak irresponsibly, and all these behaviors lead to an anti-intellectual, closed community that prevents students from being able to “embrace the full spectrum of ideas and opinions, without prejudgment….� The article goes on to say that Lawry feels that “A less threatening campus…will help the College retain some of the students who tend to leave Antioch because they feel attacked by other students.�
Where did the President’s perspective come from after such limited exposure to the student body, or anyone else in the community? Is this based on anecdotal information provided by those who oriented him before his arrival? In his presentations, Lawry sites a conversation he had with a student while he was on campus being interviewed for the presidency- a student who had said that he might transfer out of Antioch because he felt uncomfortable with the campus culture. Lawry has also mentioned how a student wearing Nike sneakers got attacked for not being more sensitive to the scourge of sweatshop production. OK, but is there some concrete data to support the theory that the campus culture is the main reason we lose students, or why students don’t come to Antioch? Past data from the exit interviews conducted by the Dean of Students Office over the years has shown that students leave for a variety reasons, including financial, social, academic, developmental, and finding a dream co-op, but very rarely because of campus culture and climate. According to existing data, there has never been one overriding reason for student attrition.
And so, it’s been almost 10 months since this message was first delivered. What steps have been taken to change the campus culture? Apparently, the governance system has been targeted as an axis of confrontation and is described as “out of control� and combative with the administration.
I am puzzled by this assessment. I served on Community Council (ComCil) in 05/06 and was extremely impressed with the high and civil level of discourse between faculty, staff and students, the student chair’s oversight of the meetings, the humor and creativity of the members, and the overall sense of responsibility members felt for the community. We debated, persuaded, challenged, changed our minds, built consensus and agonized over some difficult and frustrating situations on the campus. We also made every effort to engage with the administration to orient the new President to the Council’s purpose, and to express concern over some of the decisions that were being made without any consultation with Comcil, decisions that had historically been brought to Comcil for deliberation and input.
Although at times a very frustrating experience, for me as an alum, it defined one of Antioch’s core values and part of its mission – to create informed risk takers through participation in a laboratory of democratic decision- making. It would be a mistake to define Antioch’s system of governance as a locus of power for all decision- making, but it would be equally misguided to discredit and ignore the significant educational implications of the decision-making process that happens within this system.
Community governance at Antioch provides one of the most unique educational experiences the College has to offer and, if properly facilitated, allows all community members to feel some ownership and responsibility for the community in which they live and work. For students, these skills are further developed and tested in the various co-op communities they enter around the globe. It is this praxis that, with trial and error, teaches students some sense of humility and cultural mobility. It is the ingredient that helps to turn out so many interesting, entrepreneurial, and, yes, outspoken graduates. Last year Antioch College had three graduating students receive Fulbright awards. That sort of intellectual inquiry doesn’t happen in a vacuum!
I have never understood the concern that oppositional perspectives, be they conservative or radical, are somehow oppressed at Antioch.
Antioch alumni, young and old, have always been represented throughout the political spectrum. I know for a fact that Republicans and radicals (some now democrats) actually sit side-by-side with each other as Trustees and Alumni Board members! The alumni work in both the for-profit and non-profit sectors, many are organizers, artists and educators, but regardless of their path, most feel passionately about their values. The alumni take Antioch’s first President Horace Mann’s dictum “Be ashamed to die until you win some victory for humanity� very seriously.
There are some very real challenges facing Antioch right now, and while there is nothing inherently wrong with working on creating a campus that promotes open dialog, the administration needs to be sure to walk the talk and to create a forum that builds consensus around what the walk is…and maybe what shoes should be worn. I would also hope that energy is quickly shifted to other institutional priorities with specific steps being outlined on how best to address the recruitment and retention of students and faculty of color, improving the physical plant, supporting faculty moral, professional development and the integrity of tenure, and building a culture of mutual respect and labor incentives for the union workers, exempt staff and middle managers.
Top-down decision-making rarely has any educational value and it generally doesn’t promote a climate of mutual respect or intellectual freedom. If retention, recruitment and fund raising are the priorities right now (as they have been for decades), the entire Antioch community should be embraced as ambassadors, future alumni, future donors, future leaders, and advocates of an extraordinary educational experience that has held a truly unique place in the landscape of higher education.
Callie Cary ‘84
Second-generation alum and former Director of Alumni Relations